//

How VP lost its head white-knighting the Lolita Question

Table of Contents

  1. Defending RMS
    1. Stallman's Progressive crime: autistic lack of crimestop
      1. suones of Jim's Blog
      2. Cloudswrest
    2. Stallman's Puritan crime: probably nothing
  2. VP's LQ purple pill is wrong
    1. AoC in Italy is 14.
    2. VP@ | rebutting LQ cucks | censored
  3. What then must be done?

The trial of Richard Stallman is an opportunity to reflect on the weaknesses of the Vox Popoli faction. Many at VP are eager to join Progressive feminists in condemning RMS for "pedophilia." VD has been purple pilled on the Lolita Question since Moira Greyland, and he has doubled down hard on his error, declaring it a litmus for Cabal evil and a rhetorical counter to "racist". The spergs are here to set the record straight.

Defending RMS

Stallman's Progressive crime: autistic lack of crimestop

suones of Jim's Blog

Jim's Blog understands the Lolita Question better than anyone:

suones says:
2021-04-04 at 05:29

Stallman is the creator of Emacs, GCC, and GNU — basically everything in the base “Linux” OS apart from the kernel which was created by Linus. A hacker of truly remarkable ability.

He is economically a left-anarchist nerd who is, unsurprisingly, meritocratic — he opposed the counterculture hippies, listened to classical music instead of Beatles, and so on. He’s the last remnant of the tech-priesthood that used to exist at Harvard, and later MIT, before they all got purged (Minsky, Sussman axis). The “last real hacker,” so to speak.

Unlike Linus, Stallman is a hardcore idealist and rationalist, and will follow “unclean” thoughts to their logical conclusion — he is incapable of crimestop, which is why he’s being purged while Linus cucked to survive.

As to why he’s being attacked: he came very close to the “minor” girl pill. One of Epstein’s whores gave a laundry list of his clients to law/media. It included Marvin Minsky, a pioneering AI researcher at MIT. Now Minsky was part of Epstein’s Jewish network, but not of his whore network. In fact, the whore admitted herself that while Epstein had ordered her to service Minsky, the latter actually refused her and nothing actually happened.

Since MIT has remained somewhat more tech-aligned than most (apart from Caltech), and being right across town from Harvard, is a major thorn in Harvard’s side. SJWs took this opportunity to tar Minsky’s reputation, and with Epstein, his entire Judaic cabal. LOL j/k, SJWs know which side their bread is buttered on, so attacked hackers of MIT. This is a transparent enough attack, and one of Minsky’s autistic disciples waded right into it to preserve the reputation of his guru. That disciple is Stallman. While Minsky was being hysterically accused of “paedophilia rape,” Stallman pointed out that: 1) Minsky refused the whore’s innocent princess’ advances, and 2) even if he did have sex with the 17 year old girl, it was she who came to him so it couldn’t have been “rape,” being consensual, and that a 17-year-old girl is very hard to tell apart from an 18-year-old girl, so it’s not “paedophilia” either. Point 2 here is such an extreme redpill it could have come from Jim himself, but Stallman went there. Stallman probably meant to say that Epstein was trying to honeytrap Minsky and failed, but the logic behind it is completely verboten, and crimestop bells went off all around the world.

https://blog.reaction.la/politics/free-software-foundation-pushes-back/#comment-2716576

Cloudswrest

VP commenter Cloudswrest also gives a good defense of Stallman:

  1. Cloudswrest April 03, 2021 10:35 PM

Here's what Stallman was guilty of, just being autistically accurate, like a good programmer. From here: https://selamjie.medium.com/remove-richard-stallman-fec6ec210794


The announcement of the Friday event does an injustice to Marvin
Minsky:
“deceased AI ‘pioneer’ Marvin Minsky (who is accused of assaulting
one of Epstein’s victims [2])”
The injustice is in the word “assaulting”. The term “sexual assault”
is so vague and slippery that it facilitates accusation inflation:
taking claims that someone did X and leading people to think of it as
Y, which is much worse than X.
The accusation quoted is a clear example of inflation. The reference
reports the claim that Minsky had sex with one of Epstein’s harem.
(See https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/9/20798900/marvin-minsky-jeffrey-epstein-sex-trafficking-island-court-records-unsealed.)
Let’s presume that was true (I see no reason to disbelieve it).
The word “assaulting” presumes that he applied force or violence, in
some unspecified way, but the article itself says no such thing.
Only that they had sex.
We can imagine many scenarios, but the most plausible scenario is that
she presented herself to him as entirely willing. Assuming she was
being coerced by Epstein, he would have had every reason to tell her
to conceal that from most of his associates.
I’ve concluded from various examples of accusation inflation that it
is absolutely wrong to use the term “sexual assault” in an accusation.
Whatever conduct you want to criticize, you should describe it with a
specific term that avoids moral vagueness about the nature of the
criticism.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/04/fsf-fights-convergence.html#c7135131328569437954

Stallman's Puritan crime: probably nothing

I didn't find Stallman's pedophilia killquotes, if they exist. My comment requesting such a quote was censored at VP:

Stallman has decades of pro-pedophilia commentary

Yeah right. He probably said something normalizing about sex with horny teen girls with pubes and boobs, you lunatic.

He's Israeli so maybe he's genuinely perverted, but where's the quote?

(That's my new non-insulting term for the fake-Jews: Israeli. Not to be confused with Israelite. They are Israelis regardless of citizenship, just as Vox is American.)

May they burn in Hell.

Stallman gave us Emacs and deserves a nubile harem. You we could probably woodchipper with no loss. For looking at a hot teenager under the age of US "consent," naturally.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/04/fsf-fights-convergence.html#comment-form

I was responding to this:

  1. Imwill April 04, 2021 3:29 AM

Yes, that's exactly what I mean. Stallman is a gamma weirdo who is deified in certain circles by the wannabe tech libertarians.
Stallman has decades of pro-pedophilia commentary. He also creeped out women at MIT… Where Epstein poured in money hand over fist.

I find any support of Stallman and now the Free Software Foundation to be indirectly supporting Cabal, no matter the noble free software ideals.

Stallman and FSF = Globohomo
May they burn in Hell.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/04/fsf-fights-convergence.html#c6336408234805481421

I don't recall anyone in the Bible cursing someone to "burn in Hell," much less an entire group of idealistic volunteer nerds. This is lunatic arrogance, characteristic of the fevered contagion from Anonymous Conservative's conspiratardery.

I tried to find this pedo apologia at the GeekFeminism wiki page for RMS, but failed.

https://geekfeminism.wikia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman

VP's LQ purple pill is wrong

AoC in Italy is 14.

Firstly, I think redpill "Lolita Question" advocates would be content with a compromise that set the age of consent at 14 for now. We still need age of consent laws until we de-atomize society and return to tribal patriarchy. Otherwise the pedos will wreak havoc.

14 is a good compromise between lolita lustfulness causing trouble and male predators exploiting innocence. It's important to use a number on the low end for the USA, which contains a large r-selected nigger population.

For all that VP ilk rail against international pedophilia, they never once denounce Italy's legal age of consent: 14. This is rank hypocrisy, since contextually the ephebophilia apologists they condemn as pedophiles are critiquing the USA's ridiculous 18 age of consent. VD lives in Italy.

Lest you doubt the vehemence of VP's ilk in rejecting the LQ redpill, here's a sample:

VP@ | rebutting LQ cucks | censored

  1. SirHamster March 29, 2021 12:18 AM

SacrificialLamb wrote:
No, pedoface. By the way, I will always bring up your previous defense of underage sex slavery….every time I respond to you.

For future reference, Bezzle failed the Witch Test. He failed to confess Jesus as Lord and has no moral authority.

In a thread about Milo's renunciation of homosexuality and intent to walk the straight path, Bezzle virtue signaled and then started bearing false witness about Milo.

When challenged to confess Jesus Christ as Lord, he showed zero interest in doing so.

When someone is disqualified, you don't bother acting like they have anything worthwhile to say. Disqualify and move on.

"Shut up pedophile" or "Shut up witch" will do.

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/03/white-america-begins-to-secede.html#comment-168

My reply was censored. VP is a ship of fools these days.

I checked out SirHamster's link. Bezzle didn't submit to SirHamster's bitchy berating demands, and no man would.

Equating redpilling on the Lolita Question with being a pedophile is an un-Biblical lie that trivializes sodomite pederasty. SirHamster and Sacrificial Lamb are both fools, and VD is purple pilled on the LQ.

You half-conservatives will never break the pedo-Cabal as long as you force its alliance with men attracted to sub-18 jailbait, which is substantially all of them. Especially when your blue-pilled cuck laws render jailbait the only virgins around.

While I am proud of the late average historical age of marriage/sex for K-selected Hajnal Aryans and ?East Asians, reality is what it is. Fail to heed the words of the Song of Solomon about the "little sister who is a door" at your family's peril.

What then must be done?

The paradox is that this feverish purple-pilling perpetuates the very evils their weak sentimental hearts go mad over.

The pedo mafia is a powerful Cabal faction due to cohesion granted by prohibition and puritanicalism. The way to break the pedo mafia is to destroy its systemic sources of cohesion. Drain the swamp and the true monsters will have nowhere to hide, their fellow fish turning them in to gain favor.

Legalize possession of pedo porn for personal use. Now the wankers with a conscience are no longer trusted mafia. Porn is a substitute for sex with women; naturally it should also be a substitute for sex with children.

Also, the law shouldn't concern itself with trifles. It is far too easy to plant a bit of pedo porn on someone's PC and "discover" it in a raid. This is a great way to frame dissidents. It's too much power in the hands of the state and, ironically, the pedo mafia embedded therein.

Stop calling ephebophilia pedophilia. Hetersexual attraction to 17 year old girls shouldn't be a taboo taste requiring lifelong loyalty to the pedo Cabal. That is a recipe for giving your society to Satan in one generation.

Increase fathers' rights over daughters, and abolish the age of consent nonsense for ephebophilia. Dropping US AoC laws from 18 to 14 is the right place to start. Gradually revert to Biblical laws regarding sexual matters, with private vengeance by fathers and brothers settling illegible domestic conflicts.

Weimerican fathers who wax hysterical over "pedophilic" defilement of 17 year old sluts are displacing the horrible knowledge of their total cuckolding by Uncle Samael, who claims their daughters as sacred whores of state at age 18.

Ultimately, develop strong patrilineal communities as prescribed by Biblical Law. Such communities naturally persecute true pedophiles into nonexistence. In fact they're so sexually healthy that true pedophilia doesn't even develop – which is why the Bible doesn't even mention the crime.

Publish At: Author:Leo Littlebook

Read more posts by this author

comments powered by Disqus